Crypto Industry Pushes Back Against CLARITY Act Amendments
As the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act of 2025 moves closer to markup, crypto industry leaders are raising red flags over a newly added section that echoes the regulatory stance of the SEC under former Chair Gary Gensler. Critics argue the amendment could stifle innovation and reintroduce contentious policies from what many in crypto circles dub the “Gensler era.”
 platforms</li>
<li><strong>Tighter restrictions</strong> on crypto service providers</li>
<li><strong>Vague compliance requirements</strong> resembling past SEC enforcement actions</li>
</ul>
<h3>Industry Reactions: Innovation vs. Regulation</h3>
<p>Prominent figures in the crypto space have taken to social media and lobbying channels to voice concerns. “This feels like déjà vu,” remarked one blockchain CEO, who requested anonymity. “We’re seeing the same playbook that drove projects offshore during the last administration.”</p>
<p>Meanwhile, proponents of the amendment argue it brings necessary guardrails to protect investors. “The crypto market has matured, and so must its regulations,” stated a congressional staffer involved in the markup process.</p>
<h3>The Global Context</h3>
<p>The debate comes as other jurisdictions like the EU (with MiCA) and Hong Kong advance their own crypto frameworks. Analysts suggest the U.S. risks falling behind if the CLARITY Act adopts what critics call “reactionary” measures.</p>
<h4>What’s Next?</h4>
<p>With today’s markup session underway, stakeholders are watching for:</p>
<ol>
<li>Potential revisions to the contested language</li>
<li>Alliances forming between crypto advocates and lawmakers</li>
<li>Market reactions to regulatory uncertainty</li>
</ol>
<p>As Bitcoin’s price shows volatility (<a href=)
see chart above), the crypto community braces for a pivotal moment in U.S. digital asset policy.
